Spec Review
Wholesale badminton shuttlecock specification review
Match the quotation, sample and requested evidence to one identified item. A visible photograph is a starting point; it does not establish the material description, dimensions, weight, speed designation or production approval.
Request a specification reviewAn item record that exposes missing answers
Material record
Request feather or nylon identification, base construction and the exact quoted item identifier. Confirm which sample represents the proposal.
Test record
Request the measurement method, sample identifier and document revision. A family-level claim does not establish the exact shuttle's results.
Packaging record
Request the tube count, pieces per tube, artwork revision and carton dimensions. Keep custom pack charges separate.
Shipment confirmation
Request destination scope, gross weight, freight inclusions and supplier-confirmed timing assumptions. Record unresolved exclusions.
Use a separate row for every construction and speed variant. Record the requested value, supplier response and buyer decision; retain the source document revision with each answer. Blank cells mean unresolved questions, not acceptable defaults.
| Review field | What to request | Acceptance question |
|---|---|---|
| Material and construction | Feather or nylon skirt; cork or composite base description | Does the sample match the quoted construction? |
| Dimensions and weight | Requested dimensions in mm and weight in g, with agreed variation | Which measurement method and allowance will govern? |
| Speed and environment | Supplier speed designation and indoor review conditions | Has the buyer approved flight observations for this use? |
| Quantity and pack basis | Pieces per tube, tubes per carton and pack ratio | Do both quotations represent the same piece count? |
| Delivery scope | US destination, carton dimensions, freight inclusions and exclusions | Which charges are missing from the comparison? |
| Evidence identifier | Exact item, manufacturer identification and document revision | Does exact-item test evidence cover this proposal? |
A request for 50 tubes containing 12 pieces each totals 600 pieces. If another proposal uses a different tube count, convert to pieces before comparing. This worked example is not a price, stock, order minimum or standard pack declaration.
Make the review reproducible
Buyer provides the acceptance plan
- Identify the sample. Record the supplier item identifier, construction, speed marking, sample date and artwork revision before unpacking.
- Write the conditions. Note court location, indoor conditions, reviewer and intended activity; use the same agreed comparison routine for each sample.
- Separate observations from approval. Log measured dimensions, weight, visible defects and court observations, then ask the designated buyer to accept or reject each criterion.
- Close the production questions. Ask whether the approved sample represents the proposed construction and pack; retain open document questions until the supplier answers.
Supplier supplies item-specific answers
Ask for the proposed construction, exact-item document revision, production sample relationship and confirmed pack details. The service organizes those questions; supplier records remain subject to review.
Three limits remain: a related sample cannot approve a different production item; a product-family claim cannot establish certification; and a favorable unit price cannot resolve omitted freight or packaging costs. The review method offers procurement checks, not laboratory results.
High-end, mid-range and budget preferences should be translated into permitted material, finish and service trade-offs. Keep necessary performance criteria separate from optional custom packaging. Undecided buyers can ask for alternatives on the same recorded scope without an existing quote.